Science Source

Resolving Future Arctic/Midlatitude Weather Connections

States that high‐latitude forcing is a new potential driver for sub‐seasonal weather impacts at midlatitudes in coming decades, given ongoing large changes in the Arctic
States that some metrics find supporting evidence and others report no robust correlations, while model studies reach different conclusions
Case studies from particular historical months suggest potential connections
Proposes that a difficulty in resolving the science is due to the inherent complexity and intermittent character of atmospheric dynamics, which serves as a variable causal bridge between changes in the Arctic and midlatitude weather
States that linkages may be more favorable in one atmospheric jet stream pattern than another
States that linkages are a two‐step process: thermodynamic forcing, i.e. warm Arctic temperatures and loss of sea ice, is generally favorable in the last decade, but internal atmospheric dynamics, i.e. the jet stream location and strength, must also allow for a connection
Thus, in the last decade only a few possible linkage events are noted into and out of the Arctic; for examples 2006, 2016, and 2018 had warm Arctic Januaries, and 2010 and 2017 had cold eastern North American Decembers
Finds that record large sea‐ice‐free areas and warm temperatures north of Alaska and over Baffin Bay helped to anchor the long wave atmospheric pattern, which in turn fed cold temperatures into the eastern US
States that intra‐seasonal and inter‐annual intermittency explains low direct Arctic/midlatitude linkage correlations and large variability in model studies